I’ve have also worked with Adobe Premier & Final Cut Pro X over many years as well. It is certainly a very mature package now, not perfect by any means, though no packages are & certainly in the realm of NLEs. I’ve been using DaVinci Resolve Studio consistently since v12, have been through the beta testing cycles of v14, 15 & 16 with Blackmagic now on the current version 16.1.1. Wondering if anyone uses DaVinci Resolve 16 for video editing, and your opinion on the suite. Hopefully one of those hints will solve yout Problem.Hello. If RAM is loaded 98%, your CPU, the HDD and your graphic card runs at 100% it starts to become tricky.Īs DaVinci is a real Vampire, stay above the minimun hardware requirements and use a M2 SSD (as your system is as fast as the slowest component…) for working wih your video files, as the harddisk realy has to deliver during the Rendering process….

So check the load of your engine during Rendering process in the Task Manager. It looks like that he 'Forgets' to calculate some pixels. I have the feeling, that your pc may not really handle the heavy payload during the rendering process. With this in mind, it is pretty obvious, that the program heavily drains the resources of the engine you are working with. Recently they kicked out 2 updates within 1 week!ģrd.: As I now nothing about your hardware components, please keep in mind, that DaVinci is a professional post-production software, that renders Ultra-HD cinamatic 2h Videos, containing a hell of fusion objetcts, in hours, and not in weaks.

The YouTube settings in DaVinci offer 1080p (anway even Ultra-HD.)! So my first recommendation is to put the settings Full-HD.Ģnd.: As the Version 16 of DaVinci is rather new, check out for the latest updates. resolution of the video above is only 720p. Something I never experienced with DaVinci´s YouTube defaults.įirst of all I recognized, that the max. After watching your video I have to agree, that somting goes wrong during the rendering process.

Davinci resolve 16